“I chose”. Case Study of An Inclusive Fashion Design Education Project
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2611-0563/22971Parole chiave:
Disability, Choice, Autonomy, Adaptive Wear, EducationAbstract
A significant portion of the population is excluded from fashion, not by choice, but by design. Most fashion products are not created with disabled individuals in mind, fashion imagery rarely represents them, and physical stores often remain inaccessible due to architectural barriers. The problem extends to fashion education. Most fashion schools don’t include design for disability in their curricula, prioritizing market demands over human-centered design and teaching students to cater to industry trends rather than diverse bodies. But what might the industry look like if inclusivity were central to a student’s education rather than an afterthought? Is it possible to teach fashion design in a more inclusive way? Two years ago, Milan’s IUAD launched a project with the daycare center Il Melograno, whose guests have various physical and cognitive disabilities. Students partnered with these individuals, creating clothes first for them and then with them. The outcomes of the project were then presented to the public, giving disabled people direct access to and visibility within the fashion world. The next stage will be to launch an inclusive fashion brand. This essay presents a case study of the project from both an educational and a social point of view.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Burke, Sinéad. “The Limits of Fashion’s Inclusivity.” The New York Times, September 30, 2018. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/30/fashion/disabled-beauty.html.
Cho, Seunghye. “Empathic Design Approaches for the Development of Adaptive Wear.” International Textile and Apparel Association Annual Conference Proceedings, Vol. 78, no. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.31274/itaa.13296
Coherent Market Insights. “Adaptive Clothing Market Analysis & Forecast.” Accessed July 25, 2025, https://www.coherentmarketinsights.com/market-insight/adaptive-clothing-market-2294.
Foster, Jordan, and David Pettinicchio. “A Model Who Looks Like Me.” Journal of Consumer Culture, Vol. 22, no. 3 (2021): 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/14695405211022074
Godart, Frédéric C., and Ashley Mears. “How Do Cultural Producers Make Creative Decisions? Lessons from the Catwalk.” Social
Forces, Vol. 88, no. 2 (2005): 671–692. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40645820.
Kaufman, Sara, and Anna Zinola. “Designing with the people in mind — notes on disability.” Media Arts Design Education +, (2025): 171–195.
McDonagh, Deana, and Joyce Thomas. “Disability + Relevant Design: Empathic Design Strategies Supporting More Effective New Product Design Outcomes.” The Design Journal, Vol. 13, no. 2 (2010): 180–98. https://doi.org/10.2752/175470710X12735884220899
Mingus, Mia. “Access Intimacy: The Missing Link.” Leaving Evidence. Accessed July 23, 2025. https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/access-intimacy-the-missing-link/.
Nesbitt, Philippa. “The Paradox of Visibility: Disability Inclusion in Fashion Media and Runways.” Fashion Studies, Vol. 5, no.1
(2025). Doi:10.38055/UFN050105.
Thomas, Lorraine. “Disability is Not so Beautiful: A Semiotic Analysis of Advertisements for Rehabilitation Goods.” Disability Studies Quarterly, Vol. 21, no. 2 (2001). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v21i2.280
Townsend, Katherine, and Ania Sadkowska. “Re Making Fashion Experience: A Model for ‘Participatory Research through Clothing Design’.” Journal of Arts & Communities, Vol. 11 no. 1–2 (202):13–33. https://doi.org/10.1386/jaac_00012_1
Downloads
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Sara Kaufman

Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.