Sensory Explorations: A Critical Multisensory Approach to Fashion Pedagogy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.60923/issn.2611-0563/22969Keywords:
Fashion education, sensory design, sonic, tactile, smellAbstract
The sensory experience of fashion is complex and nuanced. Yet visual dominance creates an inherent ocularcentric bias that overlooks a rich diversity of sensory knowledge and experience in fashion education.
This article explores sensory approaches to fashion design education as a method for cultivating inclusion and innovation. Three fashion educators, two who are sighted and one who is legally blind, offer a critical reflection on their multisensory teaching practice, represented by workshops and course description on sonic fashion, olfactory considerations of clothing, and sensory design.
In these case studies, sensory experience serves as both subject and method, inviting a critique of norms while considering multiple embodied ways of exploring, knowing and creating fashion. Situated in an interdisciplinary theoretical framework from fashion studies, sensory studies, and disability studies, the findings suggest that this approach creates deeper engagement and access for disabled and nondisabled students, enriching the creative processes by challenging normative visual-centric methods.
The article demonstrates how multisensory fashion pedagogy accomplishes three critical transformations that reimagine fashion education: it displaces visual dominance to expand design possibilities, advocates for the legitimacy and value of embodied knowledge, and builds communities that celebrate diverse ways of knowing to invite authentic representation and counter ableism.
References
Bang, Anne Louise. “The Repertory Grid as a Tool for Dialog about Emotional Value of Textiles.” Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice, Vol. 1, no. 1 (November 2013), 9–25. https://doi.org/10.2752/175183513X13772670831038
Barry, Ben, and Deborah A. Christel, eds. Fashion Education: The Systemic Revolution. Bristol, England: Intellect Ltd, 2023.
Cheang, Sarah, and Shenaz Suterwalla. “Decolonizing the Curriculum? Transformation, Emotion, and Positionality in Teaching.” Fashion Theory, Vol. 24, no. 6 (2020), 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2020.1800989
Clark, John Lee. Touch the Future: A Manifesto in Essays. New York: W.W. Norton and Company, 2024.
Classen, Constance, David Howes, and Anthony Synott. Aroma: The Cultural History of Smell. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.
Fordham, Brigham A. “Dangerous Bodies: Freak Shows, Expression, and Exploitation.” SSRN Electronic Journal (2007). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1604168
From the Community. “Despite Braille’s 200th Anniversary, There Is a Braille Literacy Crisis.” The Stanford Daily, October 7, 2024. https://stanforddaily.com/2024/10/06/braille-literacy-crisis-stanford/
Garland-Thomson, Rosemarie. Extraordinary Bodies. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997.
Giaccardi, Elisa, and Elvin Karana. “Foundations of Materials Experience: An Approach for HCI.” In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2447–56, 2015.
Gill, Carol J. “Disability, Constructed Vulnerability, and Socially Conscious Palliative Care.” Journal of Palliative Care, Vol. 22, no. 3 (September 2006), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/082585970602200309
Goethe-Institut Paris. “Beyond Seeing: Innovative Ways of Sensory Fashion Design.” 2016. https://www.goethe.de/resources/files/pdf134/pressedossier-beyond-seeing-english1.pdf
Gritten, Anthony. “The Subject (of) Listening.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, Vol. 45, no. 3 (2014), 203–19.
Gupta, Sugandha. “Sensory Textiles.” https://sugandhainhere.wixsite.com/website/gallery.
Halstead, Joshua A. “Disability Design: Summary Report from a Field Scan.” National Endowment for the Arts. Accessed March 13, 2025. http://www.arts.gov/impact/accessibility/disability-design-report
Hasling, Karen Marie, and Anne Louise Bang. “How Associative Material Characteristics Create Textile Reflection in Design Education.” Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice, Vol. 3, no. 1–2 (July 3, 2015), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/20511787.2015.1210916
Hernandez, Kathy-Ann C., Heewon Chang, and Faith W. Ngunjiri. “Collaborative Autoethnography as Multivocal, Relational, and Democratic Research: Opportunities, Challenges, and Aspirations.” A/b: Auto/Biography Studies, Vol. 32, no. 2 (2017), 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989575.2017.1288892
Higgins, Hannah. Fluxus Experience. University of California Press, 2002.
Karana, Elvin, Bahareh Barati, Valentina Rognoli, and Anouk Zeeuw Van Der Laan. “Material Driven Design (MDD): A Method to Design for Material Experiences.” 2015.
Kleege, Georgina. More Than Meets the Eye: What Blindness Brings to Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Klepp, Ingun Grimstad, Madeline Buck, Kirsi Laitala, and Marit Kjeldsberg. “What’s the Problem? Odor-Control and the Smell of Sweat in Sportswear.” Fashion Practice, Vol. 8, no. 2 (2016), 296–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2016.1215117
Kolb, David A. Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc., 2015.
Krauss, Rosalind. “Sculpture in the Expanded Field.” October, Vol. 8 (1979), 31–44.
Ladau, Emily. Demystifying Disability: What to Know, What to Say, and How to Be an Ally. New York: Random House, 2021.
Lewis, Erin, and Vidmina Stasiulytė. “Introducing Sensory-material Aesthetics in Textile Design Education.” Diseña, Vol. 20 (2022), 7. https://doi.org/10.7764/disena.20.Article.7
Lewis, Talila A. “Working Definition of Ableism - January 2022 Update.” TALILA A. LEWIS. Accessed July 11, 2025. https://www.talilalewis.com/blog/working-definition-of-ableism-january-2022-update.
Lury, Celia, and Nina Wakeford. Inventive Methods. London: Routledge, 2012. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203854921&type=googlepdf.
Macindoe, Julie. “A Sense of Forgetting and Remembering: Memories of Smell and Clothing.” Clothing Cultures,Vol. 5, no. 3 (2018), 377–89. https://doi.org/10.1386/cc.5.3.377_1
Mainsah, Henry. “Exploring Creative Pedagogies for Research Methods: Reflections from a Workshop Series.” Methodological Innovations, Vol. 15, no. 3 (2022), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991221114572
Markham, Annette. “Remix Cultures, Remix Methods: Reframing Qualitative Inquiry for Social Media Contexts.” In Global Dimensions of Qualitative Inquiry. Routledge, 2013.
McLean, Kate. https://sensorymaps.com/.
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. New York: Routledge, 2012.
Oliveros, Pauline. Deep Listening: A Composer’s Sound Practice. iUniverse, 2005. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=yzL3QjZpFoUC&oi=fnd&pg=PP2&dq=deep+listening&ots=mel3K6TwyT&sig=DTdV52EPSjlDh1JWI7S3vIQHv_U.
Paine, R. L., and B. McMahon. “The Workshop Model: Teaching Ways of Knowing and Doing.” In The 7th International Conference for Design Education Researchers, edited by Derek Jones, Naz Borekci, Violeta Clemente, James Corazzo, Nicole Lotz, Liv Merete Nielsen, and Lesley-Ann Noel. London, United Kingdom, November 29–December 1, 2023. https://doi.org/10.21606/drslxd.2024.032
Perkins, Chris and Kate McLean. “Smell Walking and Mapping.” In Mundane Methods: Methodological Innovations for Exploring the Everyday, edited by S. Hall and H. Holmes. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2020.
Pink, Sarah, Yoko Akama, and Shanti Sumartojo. Uncertainty and Possibility: New Approaches to Future Making in Design Anthropology. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2018.
Riisberg, Vibeke, Anne Louise Bang, Laura Locher, and Alina Breuil Moat. “AWARENESS: Tactility and Experience as Transformational Strategy.” Paper presented at Shapeshifting: A Conference on Transformative Paradigms of Fashion and Textile Design, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, NZ, 2014. https://hdl.handle.net/10292/8566
Rissanen, Timo. “Possibility in Fashion Design Education—A Manifesto.” Utopian Studies, Vol. 28, no. 3 (2017), 528–546. https://doi.org/10.5325/utopianstudies.28.3.0528
Sins Invalid. Accessed July 10, 2025. https://sinsinvalid.org/.
Sins Invalid. Skin, Tooth, and Bone. Dancers Group, 2021. https://docdrop.org/download_annotation_doc/Sins-Invalid---Skin-Tooth-+-Bone-1--6pbqk.pdf.
Silverman, Arielle M., Jason D. Gwinn, and Leaf Van Boven. “Stumbling in Their Shoes: Disability Simulations Reduce Judged Capabilities of Disabled People.” Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 6, no. 4 (May 2015), 464–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614559650
Stasiulytė, Vidmina. 2024. “Sound to Wear.” VIS-Nordic Journal for Artistic Research, Vol. 11. https://www.researchcatalogue.net/view/1161037/2241576?c=1.
Suurla, Susanna. “Bringing ‘It’ Out of the Body and Into Matter: Fostering a Contemplative and Corresponsive Methodology for Costume Design Pedagogy.” Studies in Costume & Performance, Vol. 9, no. 2 (2024), 115–32. https://doi.org/10.1386/scp_00114_1
Tepe, Jan. “Investigating Sensory Perception as a Material for Fashion Design.” In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, 1–10. New York, NY: ACM, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450384
Wilde, Danielle, Anna Vallgårda, and Oscar Tomico. “Embodied Design Ideation Methods: Analysing the Power of Estrangement.” In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 5158–5170, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025873
Williamson, Bess. Accessible America: A History of Disability and Design. New York: NYU Press, 2019. Accessed December 11, 2023. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvwrm3zv.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Julie Gork, Vidmina Stasiulytė, Sugandha Gupta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
