Uniformization in the Digital Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2611-0563/17969Keywords:
Fashion and Uniformity, Fashion and Media, Postmodern Trends, Sartorial Network, Digital CultureAbstract
This paper introduces the concept of uniformization within the theoretical framework of sartorial networks. The model of sartorial networks deals with self-organized vestimentary cultures and is designed to analyze spatiotemporal dynamics of persistence and innovation in the field of postmodern vestimentary fashions, in particular in the Digital Age. It is derived from interdisciplinary research within the tension field of fashion, media, communication and network studies. Postmodern trend pluralism is often linked to mass individualization, whereby groups or individuals are unable to articulate either their shared identity or distinction by means of sartorial practices in the media-infused culture of style bricolage and trend revivals. In contrast to these theoretical positions defining fashion in terms of differentiation and time/innovation, the approach suggested in this paper empathizes the aspects of uniformity/similarity and the importance of spatial stabilization within the framework of the fashion mechanism. Uniformization will be described as a process of connecting individuals in space through similarity. Using examples of contemporary everyday fashion trends, it will be shown that bottom-up organized networks of uniformity can emerge as unplanned structures undermining norms, regulations, or dictates, and producing recognizable patterns of conformity based on scattered activity of several participants with equal agency.
References
Baran, Paul. “On distributed communications: I. Introduction to distributed communications Networks.” IEEE Transactions on Communications Systems, Vol. 12.1 (1964): 1–9.
McDowell, Colin. McDowell’s Directory of Twentieth Century Fashion. London: Frederick Muller, 1984.
Eijkelboom, Hans. People of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Phaidon Press, 2014.
Esposito, Elena. Die Verbindlichkeit des Vorübergehenden. Paradoxien der Mode. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2004.
Ewen, Stuart and Elizabeth Ewen. Channels of desire. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1982.
Gärdenfors, Peter. Conceptual Spaces. The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2004.
GirlsTravelMagazine(GTM) (@girltravelmagazine). “Provence-Alpes-Cote d’Azur, France.” Instagram photo, July 13, 2021. https://www.instagram.com/p/CRRz7eaMTeJ/.
Hackspiel-Mikosch, Elisabeth and Stefan Haas. Civilian Uniforms as Symbolic Communication. Sartorial Representation, Imagination, and Consumption in Europe (18th–21st Century). Stuttgart: Steiner, 2006.
Hahn, Ulrike, Nick Chater and Lucy B. Richardson. “Similarity as transformation.” Cognition, Vol. 87 (2003): 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00184-1.
Hot4thespot (@hot4thespot). “I’M SHOOK @giloscope.” Instagram photo, August 3 2019. https://www.instagram.com/p/B0tadAvl1eR/.
Improviduto. “Boho Chic”. Urban Dictionary. Accessed January 31, 2006. January 20, 2021. https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=boho+chic.
Jakobson, Roman. “Zwei Seiten der Sprache und zwei Typen aphatischer Störungen.” In Aufsätze zur Linguistik und Poetik, edited by Roman Jakobson, 117–141. München: Nymphenburger Verlagshandlung, 1974.
Kamneva-Wortmann, Anna. Modenetze — Modeschwärme. Kleidungskulturen ohne zentrale Akteure. Bielefeld: Transcript,
K-Hole. “Youth mode: A report on freedom.” Accessed April 12, 2019. http://khole.net/issues/youth-mode/.
Kale, Sirin “The story of The Dress: how a £40 Zara frock stole the summer.” The Guardian online. Accessed August 19, 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2019/aug/11/the-story-of-the-dress how-a-40-zara-frock-stole-the-summer.
König, René. Menschheit auf dem Laufsteg. Die Mode im Zivilisationsprozeß. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 1999.
Lehnert, Gertrud. “Mode als Raum, Mode im Raum. Zur Einführung.” In Räume der Mode, edited by Gertrud Lehnert, 7–18. München: Fink, 2012.
Lehnert, Gertrud. “Der modische Körper als Raumskulptur.” In Theatralität und die Krisen der Repräsentation, edited by Erika Fischer-Lichte, 528–549. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2001.
McQuail, Denis. Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage, 2010.
Mentges, Gabriele. “Die Angst vor der Uniformität.” In Schönheit der Uniformität. Körper, Kleidung, Medien, edited by Gabriele Mentges and Birgit Richard, 17–42. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus, 2005.
Seyfert, Robert. Beziehungsweisen. Elemente einer relationalen Soziologie. Weilerswist: Delbrück Wissenschaft, 2019.
Sheisnotlost (@SHEISNOTLOST). “Bridgestowe Lavender, Tasmania.” Pinterest, August 12, 2012. https://www.pinterest.es/pin/582582901799963065/.
Thewanderingcountess (@thewanderingcountess). “~ Petite Provence ~ Germany.” Instagram photo, July 5, 2021. https://www.instagram.com/p/CQ8vW7wM07v/.
Tynan, Jane and Lisa Godson. “Understanding Uniform: An Introduction.” In Uniform: Clothing and Discipline in the Modern World, edited by Jane Tynan and Lisa Godson, 1–22. London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts, 2019.
Winkler, Hartmut. Diskursökonomie. Versuch über die innere Ökonomie der Medien. Berlin: Suhrkamp, 2004.
Winkler, Hartmut. Ähnlichkeit. Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos, 2021.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anna Kamneva-Wortmann
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
